From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdivia v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 10, 2012
Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH

01-10-2012

JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.1

GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ - 191370 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP DONALD SPECTER - 83925 PRISON LAW OFFICE MICHAEL W. BIEN - 96891 ERNEST GALVAN - 196065 SHIRLEY HUEY - 224114 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samantha Wolff Attorneys for Defendants


GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ - 191370

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

DONALD SPECTER - 83925

PRISON LAW OFFICE

MICHAEL W. BIEN - 96891

ERNEST GALVAN - 196065

SHIRLEY HUEY - 224114

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED

ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 2011


Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

On July 8, 2004, this Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to collect periodic attorneys' fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring defendants' compliance with the Court's Orders and collecting fees.

Pursuant to these procedures, plaintiffs sent their Quarterly Statement for the Third Quarter of 2011, covering the period of July 1, 2011 - September 30, 2011 to defendants via overnight Federal Express on October 27, 2011. Defendants submitted their objections to plaintiffs' statement on December 6, 2011. The parties completed their meet and confer on December 19, 2011, and reached an agreement as to most of the hours and all of the costs incurred in this quarter.

Pursuant to the July 8, 2004 Order, ¶ 4, the parties will defer and hold in abeyance the dispute over the remaining hours that are not settled through this Stipulation (a total of $91,797 in fees that Defendants have objected to as related to the pending Proposition 9 motions) until they are settled or a yearly motion to compel payment is brought following the meet and confer covering the fourth quarter of 2011.

The parties agree that $593,156.74 of fees and costs incurred during the Third Quarter of 2011 are undisputed. (A summary of the fees and costs, reflecting the fees at 2011 rates, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED that $593,156.74 plus interest accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 is due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

By: _________

Ernest Galvan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP

By: _________

Samantha Wolff

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Valdivia v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 10, 2012
Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Valdivia v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)