From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
Case No. 2:08-cv-1978 DAE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-1978 DAE

02-03-2012

RICARDO VALDEZ, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WALKER, GUFFEE, and VORON, et al., Defendants.


Defendants' Motion to modify the August 30, 2011 Scheduling Order (ECF No. 45) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

The deadlines delineated in the August 30, 2011 Scheduling Order regarding pretrial statements, motions in limine, the final pretrial conference, and the trial date, are vacated, and will be continued. The Court will issue an amended scheduling order accordingly.

The Court, however, denies Defendants' Motion to the extent that it seeks to modify deadlines regarding witness disclosures. Should Plaintiff file an opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment that raises new issues warranting further discovery, Defendants may seek further modification of the Scheduling Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 3, 2012.

____________________________

David Alan Ezra

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Valdez v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
Case No. 2:08-cv-1978 DAE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Valdez v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO VALDEZ, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WALKER, GUFFEE, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-1978 DAE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)