From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2014
Case No. SACV 13-335-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 13-335-FMO (JEM)

07-28-2014

VINCENT JULIAN VALDEZ, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: July 28, 2014

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Valdez v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2014
Case No. SACV 13-335-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Valdez v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT JULIAN VALDEZ, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 28, 2014

Citations

Case No. SACV 13-335-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Mundell v. Dean

Indeed, numerous federal courts since Crawford and Melendez-Diaz have found, based on Crawford and Williams,…

Corral v. Warden, Folsom State Prison

However, a court reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim must consider all of the evidence admitted at…