From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00096-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00096-SAB (PC)

04-03-2023

MICHAEL RODNEY VALDEZ, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF NO. 9)

Plaintiff Michael Rodney Valdez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On February 21, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valdez v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00096-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Valdez v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RODNEY VALDEZ, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 3, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00096-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2023)