From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Cox Commc'ns Las Vegas, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 10, 2015
No. 65383 (Nev. Feb. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 65383

02-10-2015

JOE VALDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellant, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION AND DISMISSING APPEAL

On November 12, 2014, this court entered an order reinstating briefing and directing appellant to file the opening brief and appendix within 60 days. See NRAP 31(a)(1)(B). Appellant did not file his brief within the time allowed. Additionally, respondent has filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that appellant has failed to file an opening brief. To date, appellant has failed to file the opening brief, oppose the motion, or otherwise communicate with this court. We conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and we grant respondent's motion and dismiss the appeal. See NRAP 31(d).

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge

Leon Greenberg Professional Corporation

Chamberlain Hrdicka

Duane Morris LLP/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Valdez v. Cox Commc'ns Las Vegas, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 10, 2015
No. 65383 (Nev. Feb. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Valdez v. Cox Commc'ns Las Vegas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOE VALDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

No. 65383 (Nev. Feb. 10, 2015)