From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 12, 1954
216 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 13860.

November 12, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William M. Byrne, Judge.

Philip Newman, Newman Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Cecil Hicks, Clyde C. Downing, Robert K. Grean, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and WIIG, District Judge.



On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Valdez v. McGranery, D.C.S.D.Cal., 114 F. Supp. 173, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Valdez v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 12, 1954
216 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Valdez v. Brownell

Case Details

Full title:Augustin VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., as Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 12, 1954

Citations

216 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1954)