From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 2004
870 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-3050.

March 17, 2004.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Victoria Sigler, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 95-24031.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ., and HARRIS, CHARLES M., Senior Judge.


The issue in this case is whether a comment made by the judge at the time of defendant's conviction for violation of probation indicates that the judge incorrectly believed that defendant had the burden to prove that he did not violate probation or merely expressed the notion that defendant had a "burden" to comply with the terms of his probation. In its brief, the State concedes that without clarification the record warrants a reversal. Because of the ambiguity in the record, we reverse for a new violation hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED for a new violation of probation hearing.


Summaries of

Valdes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 17, 2004
870 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Valdes v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUAN JOSE VALDES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 17, 2004

Citations

870 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)