From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdes-Pino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2009
23 So. 3d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 3D08-1417.

December 23, 2009.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice A. Butchko, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Leslie Scalley, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Forrest L. Andrews, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, JJ.


John Valdes-Pino appeals his conviction for second-degree murder asserting fundamental error in the manslaughter instruction given to the jury. We affirm the conviction.

The defendant's remaining point lacks merit.

On the record presented, we find that the then-standard instructions given by the trial court (without objection) did not constitute fundamental error. Zeigler v. State, 18 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). However, because the contrary analysis in Montgomery v. State, ___ So.3d ___, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), is currently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court, we certify decisional conflict with that First District opinion.

State v. Montgomery, 11 So.3d 943 (Fla. 2009); oral argument was heard October 7, 2009.

Affirmed. Direct conflict certified.


Summaries of

Valdes-Pino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2009
23 So. 3d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Valdes-Pino v. State

Case Details

Full title:John VALDES-PINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 23, 2009

Citations

23 So. 3d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Leggett v. State

This court has held that there is no fundamental error in the giving of this standard jury instruction.…

Walters v. State

We affirm the conviction. See Valdes-Pino v. State, 23 So.3d 871, 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). However, to…