From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valcin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 1999
739 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 99-1057, 99-0764.

Opinion filed September 1, 1999.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge, L.T. No. 95-859.

Jacques Valcin, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Alison B. Cutler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.


Jacques Valcin has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge petitioner's habitual offender adjudication. The appellant claims that, under the version of the statute applicable to him, he should not have been habitualized on count I, a life felony. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1992). The record shows that petitioner was not habitualized on that count, so this claim is without merit. We reject petitioner's other claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel without comment. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Mr. Valcin also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As the motion is identical to one or more earlier Rule 3.850 motions, it was impermissibly successive and relief was correctly denied.

Petition denied; affirmed.


Summaries of

Valcin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 1999
739 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Valcin v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACQUES VALCIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 1, 1999

Citations

739 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)