Opinion
5:24-cv-00141-SSS-SHK
02-15-2024
HECTOR VALADEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; Defendants.
DAVID G. HALM, ESQ., SBN: 179957 SHEILA vAJDi, ' Esq. SBN: 345340 QUINTAIROS, PRIETO, WOOD & BOYER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION
State Action Filed: November 28, 2023
DAVID G. HALM, ESQ., SBN: 179957 SHEILA vAJDi, ' Esq. SBN: 345340 QUINTAIROS, PRIETO, WOOD & BOYER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Hon. Sunshine S. Sykes United States District Judge
Courtroom 2
Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff HECTOR VALADEZ and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff HECTOR VALADEZ, as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, Case No. CVRI2306381 (“State Court”), entitled HECTOR VALADEZ v. TARGET CORPORATION, (the “State Court Action”), has incurred total damages, if any, that do not, and will never be claimed to, exceed $75,000.00.
Accordingly, this case does not meet the jurisdictional requirements for removal as defined in 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), and this matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside.