Vaitovas v. City of Greenville

3 Citing cases

  1. West v. Greve

    No. COA24-210 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2024)

    Additionally, "Plaintiff[s] ha[ve] not petitioned for a writ of certiorari so that th[is] Court can exercise appellate jurisdiction" to enable our review of the 15 August 2023 orders. Vaitovas v. City of Greenville, 271 N.C.App. 578, 580, 844 S.E.2d 317, 318 (2020). We therefore limit our review solely to the order from which Plaintiffs properly noticed their appeal: the 17 November 2023 order denying Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider.

  2. Vaitovas v. City of Greenville

    871 S.E.2d 816 (N.C. Ct. App. 2022)

    ¶ 11 We dismissed the appeal because the three-judge panel had not yet resolved the claims against the State—something that now appears to have been an oversight by all involved. Vaitovas v. City of Greenville , 271 N.C. App. 578, 844 S.E.2d 317 (2020). On remand, the trial court dismissed the claims against the State in a one-paragraph order incorporating its reasoning from the summary judgment ruling in favor of the municipal defendants.

  3. Carolyn Louise Gunn Testamentary Tr. v. Bumgardner

    857 S.E.2d 533 (N.C. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    "Ordinarily, this Court hears appeals only after entry of a final judgment that leaves nothing further to be done in the trial court." Vaitovas v. City of Greenville , ––– N.C. App. ––––, ––––, 844 S.E.2d 317, 318 (2020). The parties concede that this appeal is interlocutory because there are other claims still pending before the trial court and, thus, more to be done below.