From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vail v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 10, 1992
956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 90-5559, 91-1026.

February 10, 1992.

Patricia Mack Bryan, Washington, D.C., argued (Stuart M. Gerson, Jerome G. Arnold, Mark B. Stern and Ann Southworth, on the brief), for appellant.

David A. Leen, Seattle, Wash., argued (Douglas P. Radunz, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota; Edward J. Devitt, Senior District Judge.


ORDER

The petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Rehearing by the panel is also denied. The motion to certify the case to the Supreme Court of Minnesota is overruled. The panel opinion filed October 8, 1991, is hereby amended by adding footnote 11 to page 11, end of first full paragraph [ 946 F.2d 589, 594 (8th Cir. 1991)], after the words "foreclosure sale" as follows:

11. After this opinion was filed, the government has called to our attention that 38 U.S.C. § 1832(a)(4)(A) was amended in 1987 imposing a duty on the agency to provide notification to the veteran upon a showing of default. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 3732(a)(4)(A) (1991).


Summaries of

Vail v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 10, 1992
956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

Vail v. Derwinski

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE G. VAIL, ET AL., APPELLEES, v. EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, OR HIS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 1992

Citations

956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Vail v. Brown

This Court's opinion modifying the district court's judgment was filed October 8, 1991. See Vail v.…

Vail v. Brown

ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and on…