From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaden v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 27, 2021
2:19-cv-02216-TLN-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02216-TLN-CKD P

12-27-2021

ERNEST LEE VADEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT E. MAYES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties' stipulation is GRANTED.

The parties are granted leave of this Court to conduct depositions in this matter by remote means - via videoconference - provided that each participant uses the same videoconference connection, and that each participant can hear, and be heard by, each other participant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court reporter physical presence requirement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28 shall not apply to depositions conducted in this matter. The court reporter is not required to be in the same physical location as any deponent.


Summaries of

Vaden v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 27, 2021
2:19-cv-02216-TLN-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Vaden v. Mayes

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE VADEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT E. MAYES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 27, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-02216-TLN-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)