From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaden v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 10, 2023
2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P

07-10-2023

ERNEST LEE VADEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT L. MAYES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that the court order “Defendants to create documents detailing any and all conversations Defendants' counsel (or anyone by his direction) has participated in relevant to this action Pre or Post the discovery deadline.” The court has no authority to order defendants to create evidence. Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 165) is denied. Plaintiff is warned, as he was in the court's February 28, 2023, order, that if he continues to file such frivolous motions, sanctions will issue which may include a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 153 at 5.


Summaries of

Vaden v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 10, 2023
2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Vaden v. Mayes

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE VADEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT L. MAYES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 10, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)