From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaccaro v. Sapien

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
2:22-cv-01984-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01984-WBS-EFB (PC)

02-28-2023

DION JERMAINE RANDOL VACCARO, Plaintiff, v. SAPIEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 16, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 16, 2023, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's amended complaint (ECF No. 18) is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.


Summaries of

Vaccaro v. Sapien

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
2:22-cv-01984-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Vaccaro v. Sapien

Case Details

Full title:DION JERMAINE RANDOL VACCARO, Plaintiff, v. SAPIEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01984-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)