From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaccaro v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

05-26-2016

In re Gaetano VACCARO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Appellants.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Tahirih M. Sadrieh of counsel), for appellants. Richard E. Casagrande, New York (Michael J. Del Piano of counsel), for respondents.


Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Tahirih M. Sadrieh of counsel), for appellants.

Richard E. Casagrande, New York (Michael J. Del Piano of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 23, 2013, which, among other things, granted the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated September 6, 2012, to discontinue petitioner's probationary employment, declared that petitioner was a tenured teacher at the time of the discontinuance, and denied respondents' cross motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, the cross motion granted, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed.

Petitioner failed to comply with the New York City Department of Education's Chancellor's Regulation Nos. C–205(28) and (29), which govern the withdrawal of a resignation and the restoration to tenure. Case law from this Court and the Court of Appeals decided after the motion court ruled makes it clear that, contrary to petitioner's argument, the procedures set forth in the regulations must be strictly complied with; accordingly, petitioner did not regain his tenured status after he was rehired by respondents (see Matter of Springer v. Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 121 A.D.3d 473, 993 N.Y.S.2d 500 [1st Dept.2014], affd. 27 N.Y.3d 102, 29 N.Y.S.3d 897, 49 N.E.3d 1189 ; Matter of Brennan v. City of New York , 123 A.D.3d 607, 999 N.Y.S.2d 62 [1st Dept.2014] ).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SAXE, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vaccaro v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Vaccaro v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:In re Gaetano VACCARO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4116
30 N.Y.S.3d 824

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Dep't of Educ. of N.Y.

The determination that petitioner was not entitled to restoration of his tenure on the ground that he failed…

Richardson v. Farina

Id. The case does not speak to the status of formerly tenured employees who have resigned and were no longer…