From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VA Mgmt., LP v. Odeon Capital Grp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 10, 2020
189 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12611 Index No. 654492/19 Case No.2020–02368

12-10-2020

VA MANAGEMENT, LP, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ODEON CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., New York (Mark Knol, David Butler and Gregory S. Sparer of counsel), for Odeon Capital Group LLC, appellant. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York (Alexander C. Drylewski and James Carroll, of the bar of the State of Massachusetts, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, appellant. Duane Morris LLP, New York (Dana B. Klinges of counsel), for C & Co/PrinceRidge LLC and J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC, appellants. Susman Godfrey LLP, New York (Beatrice C. Franklin of counsel), for respondent.


Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., New York (Mark Knol, David Butler and Gregory S. Sparer of counsel), for Odeon Capital Group LLC, appellant.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York (Alexander C. Drylewski and James Carroll, of the bar of the State of Massachusetts, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, appellant.

Duane Morris LLP, New York (Dana B. Klinges of counsel), for C & Co/PrinceRidge LLC and J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC, appellants.

Susman Godfrey LLP, New York (Beatrice C. Franklin of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered on or about April 29, 2020, which denied defendants' CPLR 3211(a) motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motions granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The facts alleged in the complaint describe a fraudulent scheme between employees of plaintiff and employees of defendants in which plaintiff benefitted directly from its employees' fraud by way of inflated net asset values for the funds it managed. This benefit to plaintiff directly from the fraudulent acts of its employees renders the adverse interest exception to the in pari delicto defense unavailable ( Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, 15 N.Y.3d 446, 466, 912 N.Y.S.2d 508, 938 N.E.2d 941 [2010] ).


Summaries of

VA Mgmt., LP v. Odeon Capital Grp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 10, 2020
189 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

VA Mgmt., LP v. Odeon Capital Grp.

Case Details

Full title:VA Management, LP, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Odeon Capital Group, LLC, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 525
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7482

Citing Cases

Sharp v. Duff & Phelps, LLC

The Plaintiffs' argument that it gets extra tack-on days at the end of the statute of limitations period…