Opinion
8486 Index 452721/14
02-21-2019
Peter Sistrom, New York, for appellant. Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., New York (Jeffrey Turkel of counsel), for respondent.
Peter Sistrom, New York, for appellant.
Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., New York (Jeffrey Turkel of counsel), for respondent.
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered December 27, 2017, which denied plaintiff New York City Transit Authority's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court correctly denied the Transit Authority's motion ( CPLR 3212[f] ; Windley v. City of New York, 104 A.D.3d 597, 598–599, 961 N.Y.S.2d 441 [1st Dept. 2013] ). The record does not permit resolution, as a matter of law, of the issue of whether the Transit Authority waived the covenant requiring defendant landowner, 4761 Broadway Associates, LLC, to provide maintenance for the entrances, passages and stairwells leading to the subject subway stop ( Condor Funding, LLC v. 176 Broadway Owners Corp., 147 A.D.3d 409, 410–411, 46 N.Y.S.3d 99 [1st Dept. 2017] ; see Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Mgt., L.P., 7 N.Y.3d 96, 104, 817 N.Y.S.2d 606, 850 N.E.2d 653 [2016] ).