Opinion
2:20-cv-01773-JCM-VCF
01-20-2023
MARTIN SUNDAY UWAH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Sheriff; KEVIN MENON, individually; RICARDO LOPEZ, individually; DOE OFFICERS I - III, individually, Defendants.
MCLETCHIE LAW Margaret A. McLetchie Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Pieter M. O'Leary, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15297 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12658 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah MARQUIS AURBACH Jackie V. Nichols Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon, and Ricardo Lopez
MCLETCHIE LAW
Margaret A. McLetchie
Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10931
Pieter M. O'Leary, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 15297
Leo S. Wolpert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12658
Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah
MARQUIS AURBACH
Jackie V. Nichols
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
Jackie V. Nichols, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14246
Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon, and
Ricardo Lopez
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR LVMPD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (THIRD REQUEST)
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah, by and through their counsel of record, Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq., Pieter M. O'Leary, Esq., and Leo S. Wolpert, Esq., of McLetchie Law, and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Lombardo”), Officer Kevin Menon (“Menon”), and Officer Ricardo Lopez (“Lopez”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 59] by an additional (7) days, extending the deadline from January 19, 2023 to January 26, 2023. This is the third stipulation for extension of time for LVMPD Defendants to reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. This request is based upon the following:
1. LVMPD Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on September 29, 2022 [ECF No. 59];
2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to LVMPD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on December 15, 2022 [ECF No. 74];
3. Counsel for LVMPD Defendants initiated this request due to their scheduling conflicts limiting their ability to timely and adequately respond to Plaintiff's opposition;
4. The Parties have agreed to a 1 week extension for LVMPD Defendants'
Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
5. This is the Parties' third request to extend the deadline to LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
6. Accordingly, the deadline for LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, currently due on January 19, 2023, be extended to and including Thursday, January 26, 2023; and
7. This Stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.