Opinion
2:20-cv-01773-JCM-VCF
12-30-2022
MARTIN SUNDAY UWAH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Sheriff; KEVIN MENON, individually; RICARDO LOPEZ, individually; DOE OFFICERS I - III, individually, Defendants.
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon, and Ricardo Lopez MCLETCHIE LAW Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12658 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah MARQUIS AURBACH Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12658 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon, and Ricardo Lopez
MCLETCHIE LAW Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12658 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah
MARQUIS AURBACH Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12658 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR LVMPD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Martin Sunday Uwah and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Lombardo”), Officer Kevin Menon (“Menon”), and Officer Ricardo Lopez (“Lopez”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 59] by an additional (14) days, extending the deadline from December 29, 2022 to January 12, 2023. This is the first stipulation for extension of time for LVMPD Defendants to reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. This request is based upon the following:
Counsel for LVMPD Defendants initiated this request due to their scheduling conflicts limiting their ability to timely and adequately respond to Plaintiff's opposition.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline to file LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment up to and including January 12, 2023.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.