Uwah v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Full title: MARTIN SUNDAY UWAH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

2:20-cv-01773-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01773-JCM-NJK

12-02-2022

MARTIN SUNDAY UWAH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Sheriff; KEVIN MENON, individually; RICARDO LOPEZ, individually; DOE OFFICERS I - III, individually, Defendants.

MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, NBN 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, NBN 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon and Ricardo Lopez MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931 LEO S. WOLPERT, Nevada Bar No. 12658 MCLETCHIE LAW Counsel for Plaintiff Dr. Martin Sunday Uwah

MARQUIS AURBACH

Craig R. Anderson, NBN 6882

Jackie V. Nichols, NBN 14246

Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kevin Menon and Ricardo Lopez

MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931

LEO S. WOLPERT, Nevada Bar No. 12658

MCLETCHIE LAW

Counsel for Plaintiff Dr. Martin Sunday Uwah

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO OPPOSE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FOURTH REQUEST) [ECF NO. 59]

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff MARTIN SUNDAY UWAH and Defendants LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, KEVIN MENON and RICARDO LOPEZ, (collectively “LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) by an additional seven (7) days, extending the deadline from December 1, 2022, to December 8, 2022. This is the fourth stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiff to oppose Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. This request for extension is based upon the following:

Counsel for Plaintiff initiated this request due to family obligations and travel abroad by both Ms. McLetchie and Mr. Wolpert, which hindered their ability to adequately brief the issues in this dispositive motion. Furthermore, Ms. McLetchie has been further hindered in her ability to adequately brief this matter due to unexpected illnesses from which she has only recently recovered. The extension will allow Plaintiff to adequately and concisely brief the issues.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline to file Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment up to and including December 8, 2022.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.