From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UUSI, LLC v. Webasto Roof Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2016
2016-1517 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1517

12-09-2016

UUSI, LLC, Appellant v. WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

JOSEPH BARBER, Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL BLISS, GERALD E. MCGLYNN III, Royal Oak, MI. CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL, GABRIELLE LAHATTE, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00650.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH BARBER, Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL BLISS, GERALD E. MCGLYNN III, Royal Oak, MI. CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL, GABRIELLE LAHATTE, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

UUSI, LLC v. Webasto Roof Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2016
2016-1517 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)
Case details for

UUSI, LLC v. Webasto Roof Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UUSI, LLC, Appellant v. WEBASTO ROOF SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 9, 2016

Citations

2016-1517 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)