Opinion
2021-1060 2021-1122
03-09-2023
UUSI, LLC, DBA NARTRON, Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Cross-Appellant KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
LAWRENCE MILTON HADLEY, Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen &Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN UNDERWOOD. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS, TOR TARANTOLA. BRADLEY HINSHELWOOD, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, SARAH E. CRAVEN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00908.
LAWRENCE MILTON HADLEY, Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen &Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN UNDERWOOD.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS, TOR TARANTOLA.
BRADLEY HINSHELWOOD, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, SARAH E. CRAVEN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM
DYK, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.