Util. Assocs., Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.

Full title: UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant v. DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

2016-1626 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1626

01-13-2017

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant v. DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID S. MORELAND. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00725.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID S. MORELAND. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court