From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Cent. Hudson Gas Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1947
271 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

January 14, 1947.


The defendant, Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation, has appealed from an order of Special Term, which denied its motion to implead Chester A. Miller and Filorian Tischhauser as parties liable over to the moving defendant on its cross complaint in the event a recovery is had by the plaintiff against it. The grounds of negligence in the cross complaint are divergent from the grounds of negligence in the complaint. To implead the defendants in the cross complaint would result in confusion and seriously complicate the trial. It would compel plaintiff to meet an issue which it does not raise in its pleading. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. [See post, p. 1047.]


Summaries of

Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Cent. Hudson Gas Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1947
271 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Cent. Hudson Gas Elec

Case Details

Full title:UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. CENTRAL HUDSON GAS AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)