Opinion
October, 1910.
Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that the motion for a new trial should have been granted upon proper terms.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Utess v. Erie Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Utess v. Erie Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Utess v. Erie Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:Max F. Utess, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1910
Citations
140 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)