From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Usher v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
CIV. NO. S-10-2202 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-10-2202 MCE GGH PS.

November 22, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se in this foreclosure action. On October 12, 2010, this court issued findings and recommendations, recommending dismissal with prejudice after pointing out the defects in the complaint.

On October 28, 2010, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint. Plaintiffs' motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. Since plaintiffs did not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. More importantly, plaintiffs have not set forth facts which would support a basis for amendment. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend must therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' October 28, 2010 motion for leave to amend, (dkt. #12), is denied.

DATED: November 22, 2010


Summaries of

Usher v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
CIV. NO. S-10-2202 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Usher v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND USHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

CIV. NO. S-10-2202 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)