From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Used Boat Haven Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which, upon converting the defendant's motion to one for summary judgment, denied that branch of the motion, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

"[W]ords of general release are clearly operative not only as to all controversies and causes of action between the releasor and releasees which had, by that time, actually ripened into litigation, but to all such issues which might then have been adjudicated as a result of pre-existent controversies" (Lucio v. Curran, 2 N.Y.2d 157, 161-162). Here, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendant because the release which was executed by the plaintiff operated to bar this action.

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Used Boat Haven Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Used Boat Haven Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:USED BOAT HAVEN INC., Doing Business as BOAT HAVEN, et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 942

Citing Cases

Potocnik v. Tracy Tenants Corp.

Defendants also assert that because Plaintiff could have adjudicated her personal injury claim as a result of…

N.J. Boys, Inc. v. Eklecco

ersed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion which was for summary…