From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. XCEL ENERGY, INC.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 15, 2010
Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00389-WYD (D. Colo. Jun. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00389-WYD.

June 15, 2010


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Government's Motion for Clarification of Court's Scheduling Order (docket #159), filed June 14, 2010. Defendants Xcel Energy and Public Service Company of Colorado filed a response on June 16, 2010. The motion is granted as set forth in this Order.

After a careful review of the nine pending motions in this case, I have determined that time allotted for the June 24, 2010 hearing is insufficient to accommodate argument on all of these motions. Therefore, I will defer hearing argument on all Daubert motions. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Government's Motion for Clarification of Court's Scheduling Order (docket #159) is GRANTED as set forth in this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the June 24, 2010 hearing will commence at 9:00 a.m. and end not later than 12:00 p.m. I will hear argument on the following pending motions:

• Defendants Xcel Energy, Inc. ("Xcel") and Public Service Company of Colorado's ("PSCO") Motion to Compel Production of Exculpatory Evidence (docket #120)
• Defendants Xcel and PSCO's Motion for an Order (1) Requiring Disclosure to the Defendants of a Complete Version, With No Pages Taken Out, of the Chemical Safety Board's Draft Report Concerning the Cabin Creek Accident, (2) Staying the Government's Demand That the Defendants Respond to the "Facts" in That Draft Report, and (3) Prohibiting the Public Release of That Report Until After Trial in This Matter (docket #130)
• Defendants RPI Coating, Inc. and Philippe Goutagny's Motion for an Order (1) Requiring Disclosure to the Defendants of a Complete Version, With No Pages Taken Out, of the Chemical Safety Board's Draft Report Concerning the Cabin Creek Accident, (2) Staying the Government's Demand That the Defendants Respond to the "Facts" in That Draft Report, and (3) Prohibiting the Public Release of That Report Until After Trial in This Matter (docket #134)
• Defendant RPI's Motion for Clarification of the Protective Orders (docket #147)
• Government's Motion to Quash Subpoena Served on Fact Witness Donald Holmstrom for Improper Purpose (docket # 155)

It is

FURTHER ORDERED that I will defer argument on all Daubert related motions.

It is

FURTHER ORDERED that I will also hold a status conference at the June 24, 2010 hearing at which the parties shall be prepared to discuss remaining pretrial issues and to estimate a likely trial date and the length of trial. The parties shall also be prepared to discuss how they wish to proceed with all Daubert related issues after which I will set a future hearing date.


Summaries of

U.S. v. XCEL ENERGY, INC.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 15, 2010
Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00389-WYD (D. Colo. Jun. 15, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. XCEL ENERGY, INC.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. XCEL ENERGY, INC.; 2. PUBLIC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 15, 2010

Citations

Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00389-WYD (D. Colo. Jun. 15, 2010)