From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Woods

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 16, 2011
411 F. App'x 594 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7371.

Submitted: January 6, 2011.

Decided: February 16, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-cr-00131-FL-1; 5:05-cr-00131-FL-2).

Isaac Lee Woods, Regina Bailey Woods, Appellants Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, Office of the United States Attorney, Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Isaac Lee Woods and Regina Bailey Woods appeal the district court's order enjoining them from filing certain actions without first seeking leave of court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Woods, Nos. 5:05-cr-00131-FL-1; 5:05-cr-00131-FL-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2010). We deny the Woods' motion to void the district court's order and to strike the United States' reply brief. We also deny the motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Woods

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 16, 2011
411 F. App'x 594 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaac Lee WOODS; Regina…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 594 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jones

The court further warns defendant that it has authority, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, “to limit…