From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Wilson

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2008
CRIMINAL NO. 1:02-CR-0295 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2008)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:02-CR-0295.

June 12, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2008, upon consideration of the correspondence (Doc. 568), in which defendant contends that appointed counsel "has expressed her desire not to proceed on my behalf," and seeks to have the court vacate the order dated April 30, 2008 (Doc. 563) which struck defendant's pro se motion (Doc. 561) for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because he was represented by counsel, and counsel's response thereto (Doc. 570), it is hereby ORDERED that the order dated April 30, 2008 (Doc. 563) is VACATED and the pro se motion (Doc. 561) for sentence reduction is REINSTATED.

Counsel was appointed to represent defendant in matters related to sentence reductions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (See Doc. 562.)

The court will rule on the motion (Doc. 561) for sentence reduction by separate order.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Wilson

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2008
CRIMINAL NO. 1:02-CR-0295 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VINCENT ELLIS WILSON

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:02-CR-0295 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2008)