From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California. United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. CR-05-477-EJG (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CR-05-477-EJG.

February 17, 2006

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Federal Defender, DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, LEXI NEGIN D.C., Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, STEPHON LAMAR WILLIAMS, Attorneys for Defendant.

McGREGOR W. SCOTT, United States Attorney, ANNE PINGS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for United States.


STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING


This case is currently scheduled for a status hearing on February 24, 2006. The attorneys for both parties have conferred and agree that additional time is needed to continue discussions and have further meetings relating to a disposition by plea agreement. Once the discussions and meetings are complete, the parties will finalize the terms of a plea agreement in this case and Mr. Williams' undersigned counsel will need additional time to go over the agreement with him.

The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference scheduled in this case for February 24, 2006, be continued until March 24, 2006. In addition, the parties stipulate that the time period from February 24, 2006, to March 24, 2006, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act ( 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4), due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare.

A proposed order is attached and lodged separately for the court's convenience.

For the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties, filed on February 17, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for February 24, 2006, be continued until Friday, March 24, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' February 17, 2006, stipulation, the time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded from February 24, 2006, through March 24, 2006, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare.


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California. United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. CR-05-477-EJG (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHON LAMAR WILLIAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California. United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Citations

No. CR-05-477-EJG (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)