From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 23, 2008
294 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6987.

Submitted: August 14, 2008.

Decided: September 23, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00116-JBF-2).

Randy Gean Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Randy Gean Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:99-cr-00116-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2008). We grant Williams' motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 23, 2008
294 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Gean WILLIAMS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

294 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2008)