From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Welch

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Apr 17, 2007
No. 4:06cr290 SNL (E.D. Mo. Apr. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. 4:06cr290 SNL.

April 17, 2007


ORDER


This is before the Court on Defendant Austin Welch's Motion to Dismiss Counts X, XI, and XVIII of the Superseding Indictment, or in the alternative, to Obtain a Bill of Particulars for Count X of the Superseding Indictment (No. 229), and his Motion for a Bill of Particulars (No. 198). United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles issued a Report and Recommendation on February 7, 2007. No objections were filed. Upon review, the Court agrees with Judge Buckle's conclusions.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles' Report and Recommendation (No. 246) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED and INCORPORATED herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts X, XI, and XVIII of the Superseding Indictment, or in the alternative, to Obtain a Bill of Particulars for Count X of the Superseding Indictment (No. 229) be and is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Bill of Particulars (No. 198) be and is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Welch

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Apr 17, 2007
No. 4:06cr290 SNL (E.D. Mo. Apr. 17, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Welch

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN WELCH, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 17, 2007

Citations

No. 4:06cr290 SNL (E.D. Mo. Apr. 17, 2007)

Citing Cases

Hunt v. U.S.

Ordinarily, the sufficiency of an indictment is challenged by the filing of a Bill of Particulars "however, a…