From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Watts

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 9, 2006
Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00542-REB-1 (D. Colo. Mar. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00542-REB-1.

March 9, 2006


SECOND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER


Pursuant to Fed.R.Cr.P. 17.1, D.C.COLO.LCrR 26, and REB Cr. Practice Standard IV.A.1., the court enters this Second Trial Preparation Conference Order. IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That trial by jury shall commence April 24, 2006, at 8:30 a.m., in courtroom A701;

2. That the court reserves four (4) days for trial;

3. That counsel and the defendant shall appear in courtroom A701 on the first day of trial at 8:00 a.m., to review the Trial Checklist with the courtroom deputy clerk;

4. That the Trial Preparation Conference required by REB Cr. Practice Standard IV.A.1., shall commence on April 20, 2006, at 1:15 p.m., in courtroom A701;

5. That lead counsel and the defendant shall attend the Trial Preparation Conference;

6. That at the outset of the Trial Preparation conference, each party shall submit on the Witness List form required by the court (an original for the court with copies to all other parties) a "will call" witness list enumerating the name and address of each witness that will be called and a "may call" witness list enumerating the name and address of each witness that may be called; provided, furthermore, that the "will call" witness list constitutes a representation on which the court and every other party may rely that the witnesses listed will be present and available to testify during trial;

7. That at the Trial Preparation Conference the parties shall be prepared to review and discuss, inter alia, the following:

a. stipulated and proposed jury instructions and verdict forms;

b. voir dire questions;

c. the jury selection process, including alternate jurors and peremptory challenges:

1. The use of the one or more alternate jurors [Review Fed.R.Cr.P. 24(c)];

2. Pretrial designation of the alternate juror(s);

3. The number and allocation of peremptory challenges [Review Fed.R.Cr.P. 24(b) and (c)(4)]; and

4. Retention or dismissal of alternate juror(s) [Review Fed.R.Cr.P. 24(c)(3)];

d. the use of juror questionnaires (if a questionnaire is used, the parties shall surrender their copies for destruction immediately subsequent to completion of jury selection);

e. identification of all persons permitted to be seated at each party's table;

f. the pronunciation of problematic party's and witness' names;

g. the names or monikers that may be used when referring to the defendant or a witness;

h. identification of "will call" and "may call" witnesses;

i. use of deposition testimony:

1. designation of specific testimony by page and line; and

2. identification of the person selected to read deposition answers;

j. use of video depositions:

1. resolution of objections;

2. pretrial redaction, if necessary; and

3. arrangements for necessary equipment to broadcast the deposition;

k. the admission of stipulated exhibits or exhibits about which there are no objections;

l. the allocation of trial time between the parties;

m. the necessity for cautionary or limiting instructions; and

n. timing of publication, if any, of trial exhibits to the jury;

8. That consistent with REB Cr. Practice Standard IV.C.3.b., each side shall be permitted voir dire examination not to exceed 15 minutes following voir dire examination by the court, but shall not reiterate questions previously propounded by the court or another party;

9. That pending further court order, the jurors shall not be sequestered before deliberations;

10. That trial witnesses subject to sequestration under F.R.E. 615 shall be sequestered by order entered sua sponte immediately before opening statements;

11. That opening statements shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes per party;

12. That the court will not engage in the examination of any witness, except to eschew plain error;

13. That pursuant to REB Cr. Practice Standard III.D.4., each party shall have available at trial a set of exhibits for the court, the courtroom deputy clerk, opposing counsel (one set per party), and any pro se party;

14. That objections made in the presence or hearing of the jury shall be stated as succinctly as practicable and supported by recitation of apposite authority when possible; however, counsel and a pro se defendant shall not speechify an objection in the presence or hearing of the jury [Review F.R.E. 103(c) and 104(c)];

15. That in marshaling motions or objections during trial, the following sequential protocol shall be observed: objection, response, reply, ruling;

16. That consistent with F.R.E. 103(a)(2), once the court makes a definitive ruling on the record admitting or excluding evidence, either at or before trial, a request that the court note a standing or continuing objection to that same evidence will not be granted;

17. That to eliminate or minimize bench or sidebar conferences, each side shall be responsible to inform the courtroom deputy clerk before the conclusion of a trial day about any issue which should be considered before commencing trial on the next scheduled day of trial and at the outset of a trial day about any issue which should be considered at the conclusion of that trial day;

18. That the court shall advise the defendant of his right to testify, his right to remain silent, and the consequences of waiving either of those rights during mid-trial proceedings following presentation of the government's case in chief;

19. That to facilitate preparation, marshaling, and consideration of proposed jury instructions and verdict forms consistent with REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.C.5., the government shall identify and enumerate each individual jury instruction in the heading or title as INSTRUCTION NO. G-1, G-2, G-3, etc., and the defendant shall identify and enumerate each individual jury instruction in the heading or title as INSTRUCTION NO. D-1, D-2, D-3, etc.; provided, furthermore, the parties shall similarly identify and enumerate all proposed verdict forms and special interrogatories; and

20. That closing argument shall be limited to forty-five (45) minutes total for each party.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Watts

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 9, 2006
Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00542-REB-1 (D. Colo. Mar. 9, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Watts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. RAPHAEL BO WATTS, JR., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

Criminal Case No. 05-cr-00542-REB-1 (D. Colo. Mar. 9, 2006)