From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Nov 17, 2006
05-CR-558 (NG) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2006)

Opinion

05-CR-558 (NG).

November 17, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


On August 22, 2006, defendant Ronald Washington filed a motion to suppress two pre-trial identifications, arguing that the photo array shown to the witnesses was unduly suggestive. The suppression motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for a report and recommendation. On November 3, 2006, Judge Levy issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion to suppress be denied. Defendant has filed objections to the report and recommendation. After reviewing the report and recommendation, defendant's objections, and the original pictures shown in the photo array, I adopt Judge Levy's report and recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, defendant's motion to suppress is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Nov 17, 2006
05-CR-558 (NG) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RONALD WASHINGTON, also known as "Tenad,…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Nov 17, 2006

Citations

05-CR-558 (NG) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ikoli

While this Circuit has a preference for holding a Wade hearing upon a defendant's request, see United States…

Miller v. Napoli

This single difference cannot support even the threshold showing of suggestiveness . . . ."). Moreover, a…