From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Warren

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 19, 2007
235 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-50407.

Submitted July 9, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 19, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Mark C. Krause, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

FPDCA — Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-01166-JFW-02.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Isabel Linda Warren appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Warren has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Warren did not file a pro se supplemental brief. The government filed notice that it would not be filing an answering brief.

Our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Warren

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 19, 2007
235 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isabel Linda WARREN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Citations

235 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2007)