Opinion
No. 08-30018.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed November 5, 2008.
Richard A. Hosley, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
R. Hank Branom, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00058-SEH.
Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Kevin C. Walla appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Walla contends that the district court erred by failing to address all of the relevant sentencing factors that must be considered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) and by failing to give a specific reason for the term of supervised release imposed. Walla also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Zavala v. United States, ___ U.S. ___ 128 S.Ct. 2491, 171 L.Ed.2d 780 (2008); United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 951-52 (9th Cir. 2008).
AFFIRMED.