From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hoback

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 13, 2010
CASE NO. 4:10-CR-17 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2010)

Summary

In Hoback v. U.S., 284 F. 529, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in interpreting the same statute, said: "There is nothing in the point that contraband liquor cannot be the subject of larceny and embezzlement.

Summary of this case from Ray v. Commonwealth

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:10-CR-17.

August 13, 2010


ORDER


On July 21, 2010, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Indictment, conspiracy to manufacture, possess with intent to distribute and distribute five (5) grams of methamphetamine (actual) and fifty (50) grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectible amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) and Count Three Hundred Fifteen of the Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Indictment and Count Three Hundred Fifteen of the Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing; and (d) Defendant shall remain in custody pending sentencing in this matter (Doc. 209). Neither party filed an objection within the given fourteen days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and ORDERS as follows:

(1) Defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Indictment and Count Three Hundred Fifteen of the Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, is ACCEPTED;

(2) Defendant is hereby ADJUDGED guilty of the charges set forth in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Indictment and Count Three Hundred Fifteen of the Indictment;

(3) A decision on whether to accept the plea agreement is DEFERRED until sentencing; and

(4) Defendant SHALL REMAIN IN CUSTODY pending sentencing on Monday, December 6, 2010, at 9:00 am. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hoback

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 13, 2010
CASE NO. 4:10-CR-17 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2010)

In Hoback v. U.S., 284 F. 529, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in interpreting the same statute, said: "There is nothing in the point that contraband liquor cannot be the subject of larceny and embezzlement.

Summary of this case from Ray v. Commonwealth
Case details for

U.S. v. Hoback

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BILLY HOBACK

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Aug 13, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 4:10-CR-17 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2010)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. United States

See England v. United States, 5 Cir., 174 F.2d 466. Appellant says with respect to the alleged deficiencies…

Ray v. Commonwealth

" In Hoback v. U.S., 284 F. 529, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in…