"[A] district judge attempting to accept the pleas of dozens of defendants in disparate cases at one time may find it impossible to satisfy Rule 11." United States v. Walker, 418 F. App'x 359, 360 (5th Cir. 2011). As we have previously observed, "we can envision dangers arising from a court's failure to attend to details in a group plea sitting."
" Id. at p.3. Thus, even if Defendant's counsel did not inform him of the 20 year statutory mandatory minimum he faced due to the sentencing enhancement, the Defendant was thoroughly advised of this information by the Court and the plea agreement, and as a result suffered no prejudice as required for ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Walker, 418 Fed. App'x 359 (5th Cir. 2011). Defendant also accuses his counsel of improperly advising him to plea guilty. The Court finds such advise does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under the law as discussed above, particularly since by entering into the plea agreement the Defendant avoided a double bill of information for Defendant's two or more prior felony drug convictions, which would have subjected the Defendant to a mandatory life sentence pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1)(A). Additionally, Defendant has not demonstrated that such advice fell below a standard of reasonableness or that the advice prejudiced him.