U.S. v. Vimahi

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. INOKE VIMAHI, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jun 28, 2004

Case No. 2:04-CR-272 DS (D. Utah Jun. 28, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-CR-272 DS.

June 28, 2004

JEREMY M. DELICINO — 9959, Salt Lake City, Utah, Attorney for Defendant.

FINDINGS AND ORDER

DAVID SAM, Senior District Judge

Based on the motion of the defendant and stipulation of the plaintiff, the court enters the following;

FINDINGS

1. If the defendant's motion to continue were denied it would deny the defendant continuity of counsel.

2. Counsel needs additional time to effectively prepare for trial and consult with the defendant.

3. Counsel has exercised due diligence in preparing for this case.

4. The ends of justice in granting a continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the trial date of June 29, 2004, be stricken and the trial continued to the 14th day of July, 2004 at 8:30 A.M.

It is further, ORDERED that the time between June 29, 2004, and the next trial date be excluded from the computation for the time for trial as described in 18 U.S.C. § 3161.