From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Villar

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 1, 2011
Case Number: 2:10CR00169-001JB, USM Number: 53000-051 (D.N.M. Jul. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 2:10CR00169-001JB, USM Number: 53000-051.

July 1, 2011

Defense Attorney: Henry de la Garza, Appointed.


Judgment in a Criminal Case (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)


THE DEFENDANT:

Information

[X] pleaded guilty to count(s) [] pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which was accepted by the court. [] after a plea of not guilty was found guilty on count(s) The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offenses: Title and Section Nature of Offense Offense Ended Count Number(s) 8 U.S.C. Reentry of a Removed Alien 12/17/2009 Sec. 1326 (a) and (b) The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 6 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. [] The defendant has been found not guilty on count. [] Count dismissed on the motion of the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances. November 5, 2010 /s/ James O. Browning ___________________ Date of Imposition of Judgment _______________ Signature of Judge

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of 33 months.

The Court recommends that Immigration and Customs Enforcement begin removal proceedings during service of sentence.

The Court incorporates its Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed May 25, 2011 (Doc. 40). The United States Probation Office ("USPO") disclosed a Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") for Defendant Jaime Hernandez-Del Villar on March 9, 2010. In the PSR, the USPO calculated Hernandez-Del Villar's offense level to be 21 and his criminal history category to be II, establishing a guideline imprisonment range of 41 to 51 months. Pursuant to rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court accepts the plea agreement, which stipulates to a 1-level downward departure, as the Court is satisfied that the agreed offense level departs for justifiable reasons, i.e., the plea agreement is pursuant to the United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico's fast-track program, which the United States Attorney General has approved, and which meets the conditions that Congress has set for such programs. See PROTECT Act § 401(m)(2)(B), 108 Pub.L. No. 21, 117 Stat. 650, 675; U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. An offense level of 20 and a criminal history category of II establishes a guideline imprisonment range of 37 to 46 months.

Hernandez-Del Villar moves the Court for a downward departure based on cultural assimilation. The Court denies Hernandez-Del Villar's request for a cultural assimilation downward departure, because he came to the United States later in life and his criminal activity shows he has not assimilated well into society in the United States. The Court also grants Hernandez-Del Villar a downward variance; however, the Court sentences Hernandez-Del Villar to 33 months incarceration.

Hernandez-Del Villar asks the Court to downward vary because he came to the United States when he was fifteen. He notes that he arrived in the United States in 1983 and has lived here most of his life. He has two teenage children and two grandchildren in California. Hernandez-Del Villar further contends that his cultural ties to the United States were the primary motivation for his illegal reentry. Hernandez-Del Villar's siblings and parents live in Mexico. The United States notes that Hernandez-Del Villar's background includes a thirteen-year sentence for kidnaping, a conviction for discharging a firearm in the direction of a detective, and five arrests the disposition of which is unknown.

The Court believes a slight variance is warranted in this case. While Hernandez-Del Villar's circumstances do not warrant a downward departure for cultural assimilation, they make a sentence below the guideline range appropriate. Hernandez-Del Villar came here when he was fifteen and has spent much of his life in the United States. His children and grandchildren are here, which was part of his reason for returning after his deportation. These considerations support a slight variance. The Court believes that it is more appropriate to treat Hernandez-Del Villar's offense level like a 19, which, with a criminal history category II, yields a recommended sentencing range of 33 to 41 months. The Court believes that Hernandez-Del Villar's circumstances and the nature of his conviction support giving him a sentence of 33 months, at the low end of that range. On the other hand, because of his criminal history in this country, the Court does not believe a greater variance is appropriate.

Hernandez-Del Villar illegally reentered the United States after a felony conviction for a crime of violence. The Court has considered the guidelines, but, in arriving at its sentence, has taken into account not only the guidelines but other sentencing goals. Specifically, the Court has considered the guideline range for the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant. The Court believes that the punishment that the guidelines set forth is not appropriate for this sort of offense. The Court finds that a sentence of 33 months adequately reflects the seriousness of the offense, promotes respect for the law, provides just punishment, affords adequate deterrence, protects the public, and otherwise fully reflects each of the factors embodied in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). While the Court's task, as a district court, is not to arrive at a reasonable sentence — it is to come up with one that reflects the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), see United States v. Conlan, 500 F.3d 1167, 1169 (10th Cir. 2007) ("[A] district court's job is not to impose a reasonable sentence. Rather, a district court's mandate is to impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of section 3553(a)(2).") (citation omitted) — the Court believes this sentence is reasonable and more reasonable than the advisory guideline range suggests the sentence should be. Finally, the Court believes Hernandez-Del Villar's criminal history is adequately reflected in this sentence, and that this sentence is sufficient without being greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of punishment Congress set forth in the Sentencing Reform Act. [] The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: [X] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. [] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district: [] at on [] as notified by the United States Marshal. [] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: [] before 2 p.m. on [] as notified by the United States Marshal [] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on _________________________________________________________________ to ________________________________ at ______________________________ with a Certified copy of this judgment.By

__________________________________________ UNITED STATES MARSHAL __________________________________________ DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

SUPERVISED RELEASE

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of 2 years unsupervised.

The defendant must report to the probation office in the district to which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.

The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.

The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance.

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance.

The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined by the court.

[] The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse. (Check, if applicable.) [X] The defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (Check, if applicable). [X] The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (Check, if applicable). [] The defendant shall register with the state, local, tribal and/or other appropriate sex offender registration agency in the state where the defendant resides, works, or is a student, as directed by the probation officer. (Check, if applicable.) [] The defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check, if applicable) If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with the Criminal Monetary Penalties sheet of this judgment.

The defendant must comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional conditions on the attached page.

STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION

1) the defendant shall not leave the judicial district without the permission of the court or probation officer; 2) the defendant shall report to the probation officer and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five days of each month; 3) the defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer; 4) the defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities; 5) the defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons; 6) the defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment; 7) the defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician; 8) the defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered; 9) the defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall not associate with any person convicted of a felony unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer; 10) the defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere and shall permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer; 11) the defendant shall notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer; 12) the defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the permission of the court; and 13) as directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's criminal record or personal history or characteristics and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement;

SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION

The defendant must not reenter the United States without legal authorization.

CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES

The defendant must pay the following total criminal monetary penalties in accordance with the schedule of payments. Assessment Fine Restitution $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 [] The Court hereby remits the defendant's Special Penalty Assessment; the fee is waived and no payment is required. Totals:

SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS

Payments shall be applied in the following order (1) assessment; (2) restitution; (3) fine principal; (4) cost of prosecution; (5) interest; (6) penalties.

Payment of the total fine and other criminal monetary penalties shall be due as follows:

The defendant will receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties imposed.

A [X] In full immediately; or B [] $ immediately, balance due (see special instructions regarding payment of criminal monetary penalties). Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties:Criminal monetary penalties are to be made payable by cashier's check, bank or postal money order to the U.S. District Court Clerk, 333 Lomas Blvd. NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 unless otherwise noted by the court. Payments must include defendant's name, current address, case number and type of payment.

Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise in the special instructions above, if this judgment imposes a period of imprisonment, payment of criminal monetary penalties shall be due during the period of imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalty payments, except those payments made through the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, are to be made as directed by the court, the probation officer, or the United States attorney.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Villar

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 1, 2011
Case Number: 2:10CR00169-001JB, USM Number: 53000-051 (D.N.M. Jul. 1, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Villar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jaime Hernandez-Del Villar

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jul 1, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 2:10CR00169-001JB, USM Number: 53000-051 (D.N.M. Jul. 1, 2011)