From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Vigil

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jan 31, 2011
Case Number: 1:10CR01660-003 JB, USM Number: 54297-051 (D.N.M. Jan. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:10CR01660-003 JB, USM Number: 54297-051.

January 31, 2011

Defense Attorney: Dorothy Sanchez, Appointed.


Judgment in a Criminal Case (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)


THE DEFENDANT:

2 of Indictment

[X] pleaded guilty to count(s) [] pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which was accepted by the court. [] after a plea of not guilty was found guilty on count(s) The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offenses: Title and Section Nature of Offense Offense Ended Count Number(s) 21 U.S.C. Sec. Distribution of Heroin 03/07/2010 2 841(b)(1)(C) The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 6 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. [] The defendant has been found not guilty on count. [] Count dismissed on the motion of the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances. January 19, 2011 /s/ James O. Browning Date of Imposition of Judgment Signature of Judge

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of 224 days or time served, whichever is less. The Court has considered and reviewed the Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") and its factual findings with care. There not being any objections to those, the Court will adopt those as its own. Defendant Mark Vigil objected to paragraph 28 on page 7 of the PSR, which called for him receiving only two points for acceptance of responsibility, because, in the plea agreement, the parties agreed to three points for acceptance of responsibility. The plea agreement is not a rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement, so the Court remains free to accept or reject its stipulations. The United States represented that the United States Probation Office correctly calculated the applicable guideline range, and that the United States made an error in the plea agreement, but that it intended to honor that agreement. The Court overrules the objection, but will vary from the advisory guideline range. The Court having considered the sentencing guideline application in the PSR and having overruled the objection to the application, the Court will adopt the application as its own. Based on the information available to the Court, it appears that Vigil was the least culpable of all the defendants who were involved in the incident, and it does not appear that he was a leader or organizer. It is not clear how much he knew of the scope of the criminal enterprise, but it appears that he was merely a courier. The Court will therefore accept the stipulation of the parties that Vigil was a minimal participant and will recognize the 4-level reduction in the PSR. With that 4-level reduction, Vigil's offense level is 10 and his criminal history category is II, establishing a guideline imprisonment range of 8 to 14 months. The Court accepts the plea agreement, with the exception of the stipulation as to a three levels for acceptance of responsibility. The Court has considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The Court notes that Vigil distributed 17.8 net grams of heroin to a confidential source. The Court has carefully considered the guidelines, but in arriving at its sentence, the Court has taken into account not only the guidelines but other sentencing goals. Specifically, the Court has considered the guideline sentencing range established for the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant. The Court believes that the punishment that is set forth in the guidelines is not appropriate for this sort of offense. The Court has then considered the kinds of sentences and ranges that the guidelines establish, and the Court believes that a sentence of time-served reflects the seriousness of the offense, promotes respect for the law, provides just punishment, affords adequate deterrence, and protects the public. Because of some of the conditions the Court will order as part of supervised release, the Court believes that its sentence will provide Vigil with the education, training, and care he needs to overcome the problems he has. The Court believes that this sentence fully and effectively reflects each of the factors embodied in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Vigil is approximately 16 days shy of a guideline sentence at the low-end of the guideline range. The Court does not see any sound reason that its time-served sentence does not reflect the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) as well as the guideline sentence. The Court will therefore vary to a time-served sentence. The parsimony clause weighs in favor of a time-served sentence. And while the Court's task as a trial court is not to come up with a reasonable sentence, but to balance the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors correctly, see United States v. Conlan, 500 F.3d 1167, 1169 (10th Cir. 2007) ("[A] district court's job is not to impose a reasonable sentence. Rather, a district court's mandate is to impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of section 3553(a)(2).") (citation omitted), the Court believes that this sentence balances the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) appropriately and is a reasonable sentence. The Court concludes that this sentence is sufficient without being greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in the Sentencing Reform Act. [] The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: [X] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. [] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district: [] at on [] as notified by the United States Marshal. [] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: [] before 2 p.m. on [] as notified by the United States Marshal [] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on _______________________________________________ to __________________________________ at _________________________________ with a Certified copy of this judgment.

_______________________________________________ UNITED STATES MARSHAL By _______________________________________________ DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

SUPERVISED RELEASE

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of 3 years.

The defendant must report to the probation office in the district to which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.

The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.

The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance.

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance.

The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined by the court. 42 U.S.C. § 16901

[] The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse. (Check, if applicable.) [X] The defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (Check, if applicable). [X] The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (Check, if applicable). [] The defendant shall comply with the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (, et seq.) as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in which he or she resides, works, is a student, or was convicted of a qualifying offense. (Check, if applicable) [] The defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check, if applicable) If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with the Criminal Monetary Penalties sheet of this judgment.

The defendant must comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional conditions on the attached page.

STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION

1) the defendant shall not leave the judicial district without the permission of the court or probation officer; 2) the defendant shall report to the probation officer and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five days of each month; 3) the defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer; 4) the defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities; 5) the defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons; 6) the defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment; 7) the defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician; 8) the defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered; 9) the defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall not associate with any person convicted of a felony unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer; 10) the defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere and shall permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer; 11) the defendant shall notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer; 12) the defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the permission of the court; and 13) as directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's criminal record or personal history or characteristics and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement;

SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION

The defendant shall not possess, have under his control, or have access to any firearm, ammunition, explosive device, or other dangerous weapons, as defined by federal, state, or local law.

The defendant must participate in and successfully complete a substance abuse treatment program which may include drug testing, outpatient counseling, or residential placement. The defendant is prohibited from obstructing or attempting to obstruct or tamper, in any fashion, with the collection, efficiency and accuracy of any substance testing device or procedure. The defendant may be required to pay a portion of the cost of treatment and/or drug testing as determined by the Probation Office.

The defendant must submit to a search of his person, property, or automobile under his control to be conducted in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time, for the purpose of detecting alcohol, drugs or any illegal contraband at the direction of the probation officer. He must inform any residents that the premises may be subject to a search.

The defendant must refrain from the use and possession of alcohol and other forms of intoxicants. He must not frequent places where alcohol is the primary item for sale.

The defendant shall have no contact with the co-defendants in this case.

CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES

The defendant must pay the following total criminal monetary penalties in accordance with the schedule of payments. Assessment Fine Restitution $waived $0.00 $0.00 [X] The Court hereby remits the defendant's Special Penalty Assessment; the fee is waived and no payment is required. Totals:

SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS

Payments shall be applied in the following order (1) assessment; (2) restitution; (3) fine principal; (4) cost of prosecution; (5) interest; (6) penalties.

Payment of the total fine and other criminal monetary penalties shall be due as follows:

The defendant will receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties imposed.

A [] In full immediately; or B [] $immediately, balance due (see special instructions regarding payment of criminal monetary penalties). Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties: Criminal monetary penalties are to be made payable by cashier's check, bank or postal money order to the U.S. District Court Clerk, 333 Lomas Blvd. NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 unless otherwise noted by the court. Payments must include defendant's name, current address, case number and type of payment.

Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise in the special instructions above, if this judgment imposes a period of imprisonment, payment of criminal monetary penalties shall be due during the period of imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalty payments, except those payments made through the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, are to be made as directed by the court, the probation officer, or the United States attorney.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Vigil

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jan 31, 2011
Case Number: 1:10CR01660-003 JB, USM Number: 54297-051 (D.N.M. Jan. 31, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Vigil

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Mark Vigil

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 1:10CR01660-003 JB, USM Number: 54297-051 (D.N.M. Jan. 31, 2011)