From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Vanzie

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 28, 2009
325 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-15260 Non-Argument Calendar.

May 28, 2009.

Patricia D. Barksdale, Dineen A. Baker, Jacksonville, FL, David Paul Rhodes, A. Brian Albritton, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Herlitz M. Vanzie, Atlanta, GA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 92-00236-CR-J-25-JRK.

Before BLACK, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Herlitz M. Vanzie in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.

Vanzie's pro se Motion to Deny Ander's Brief Filed by Court-appointed Counsel and Motion to Substitute Counsel is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Vanzie

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 28, 2009
325 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Vanzie

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herlitz M. VANZIE, a.k.a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: May 28, 2009

Citations

325 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2009)