Summary
rejecting defendant's Tenth Amendment claim because neither of the states in which defendant had lived changed their registration requirements after SORNA's enactment
Summary of this case from U.S. v. HallOpinion
NO. 2:07-CR-105.
March 6, 2008
ORDER
This criminal matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated February 14, 2008. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the defendant' motion to dismiss the indictment, [Doc. 15], be denied. The defendant has filed a general objection to this recommendation, [Doc. 24], which states that "the defendant . . . objects to the Report and Recommendation . . . [and] relies upon the arguments made in his motion to dismiss indictment . . . and supplemental stipulation of facts." After careful and de novo consideration of the record as a whole and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's objection is OVERRULED, that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 23], and that the motion to dismiss is DENIED, [Doc. 15].