From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Usufy

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. MISC. S-10-0081-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. MISC. S-10-0081-JAM-KJN.

January 28, 2011


ORDER


On December 1, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 1, 2010, are ADOPTED; and

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

DATED: January 27, 2011


Summaries of

U.S. v. Usufy

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. MISC. S-10-0081-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Usufy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Petitioners, v. YOUNES USUFY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

No. MISC. S-10-0081-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)