From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Tullos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 1, 2007
249 F. App'x 654 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-30540.

Submitted September 24, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 1, 2007.

Aine Ahmed, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Dan B. Johnson, Esq., Dan B. Johnson, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Justin L. Quackenbush, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00035-JLQ.

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Terrell Demon Tullos appeals from the district court's judgment and 120-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(ii).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tullos' counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Tullos did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.

Our independent review of the brief and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Tullos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 1, 2007
249 F. App'x 654 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Tullos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrell Demon TULLOS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 1, 2007

Citations

249 F. App'x 654 (9th Cir. 2007)