From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Torres-Lopez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2001
4 F. App'x 440 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


4 Fed.Appx. 440 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Miguel TORRES-LOPEZ, Defendant--Appellant. No. 99-10382. D.C. No. CR-99-00490-RCB. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 21, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Accordingly, Torres-Lopez's pro se motion for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Defendant entered guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Robert C. Broomfield, J., to unlawful reentry of a deported alien, and was sentenced to 35 months imprisonment. Defendant appealed. On counsel's motion to withdraw, the Court of Appeals held that defendant's plea agreement knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw granted, and appeal dismissed.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Miguel Torres-Lopez appeals the judgment of conviction and 35 month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien. His attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a brief stating that counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous issues for review. Because our independent review of the record and the briefs on appeal pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Torres-Lopez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Martinez, 143 F.3d 1266, 1270-72 (9th Cir.1998) (enforcing waiver of right to appeal where waiver is knowing and voluntary and sentence is in accordance with plea agreement).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Torres-Lopez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2001
4 F. App'x 440 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Torres-Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Miguel TORRES-LOPEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2001

Citations

4 F. App'x 440 (9th Cir. 2001)