From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
329 F. App'x 492 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6463.

Submitted: July 23, 2009.

Decided: July 29, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:97-cr-00299-MR-1).

Steven Thomas Meier, Meier Law, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Edward Thomas appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:97-cr-00299-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We deny Thomas' motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
329 F. App'x 492 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward THOMAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

329 F. App'x 492 (4th Cir. 2009)