From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 14, 2006
CASE NUMBER: 06-20281 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 14, 2006)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 06-20281.

December 14, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


On November 30, 2006, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub submitted a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 68] recommending that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Wiretap Evidence and to Disclose Necessary Information in Connection with Suppression Motion [Doc. 46]. Because the Court has not received objections from either party within the time frame provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(3), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court, therefore, DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 14, 2006
CASE NUMBER: 06-20281 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 14, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. D-4 JERMAINE THOMAS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 14, 2006

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 06-20281 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 14, 2006)